Home › The Reading Lab

How often to practice reading

What is known, and what has not been tested

The short answer

Is short daily practice better than long sessions?

No source we read reports a direct test of short daily sessions against long ones. What the sources do report: in sound-awareness studies a session lasted 25 minutes on average, and extra small-group teaching at school is advised three to five times a week for 20 to 40 minutes.

What the research found

  • 1 × Strong evidence
  • 1 × Moderate evidence
  • 1 × Expert advice, not a trial
  • 3 × Reported by a research review
  1. For teaching awareness of sounds in words, the National Reading Panel found programs totaling 5 to 18 hours had larger effects than shorter or longer ones.

    In the source’s own words“The length of time spent teaching children was influential, with treatments lasting from 5 to 18 hours producing larger effect sizes than shorter or longer treatments.”
  2. In the panel's set of studies, a single sound-awareness session lasted 25 minutes on average, and programs under 20 hours in total did better than longer ones.

    In the source’s own words“In these analyses, programs lasting less than 20 hours were more effective than longer programs. Single sessions lasted 25 minutes on average.”
  3. The studies the panel combined varied widely in total teaching time.

    In the source’s own words“Length of instruction: Instruction varied from 1 hour to 75 hours.”
  4. For children who score below the benchmark, the intervention guide says small-group teaching should happen three to five times a week for 20 to 40 minutes.

    In the source’s own words“Intensive instruction should occur three to five times per week for 20 to 40 minutes.”
  5. For children who make little progress in small groups, the guide suggests more and longer sessions on fewer skills; it rates the evidence for this as low.

    In the source’s own words“Instruction should be intensified by focusing on fewer high priority reading skills during lessons and scheduling multiple and extended instructional sessions.”
  6. For handwriting, the writing guide says practice works best in several short sessions.

    In the source’s own words“Because handwriting is a motor skill, it works best to practice in multiple short sessions”

What this means at home

  • Short, regular practice is in line with what the studies used.
  • For handwriting, the writing guide says several short sessions work best.
  • These figures come from school programs. They are not a tested rule for home.
  • The free two-minute check points to what to practice first.

What the research does not tell us

  • For daily intensive teaching of children who made little progress, the guide found no study with a statistically significant effect on reading.
  • The 20 to 40 minute figure is for extra small-group teaching at school for children who score below a screening benchmark; it is not a tested rule for practice at home.
  • The panel's hours are totals for sound-awareness programs; the passages read do not report a direct test of short daily sessions against long sessions.

Sources

We read each of these ourselves on October 9, 2026. Follow the links to read them too.

  1. Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction: Reports of the Subgroups. National Reading Panel; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, U.S. National Institutes of Health. 2000.The full report of a panel convened at the request of the U.S. Congress, which reviewed experimental studies of reading instruction and combined their results in meta-analyses.www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf
  2. Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Response to Intervention (RtI) and Multi-Tier Intervention in the Primary Grades. Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D.; Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse (NCEE 2009-4045). 2009.A U.S. government practice guide in which an expert panel made five recommendations for finding and helping struggling readers in the primary grades and rated the evidence behind each.ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/rti_reading_pg_021809.pdf
  3. Teaching Elementary School Students to Be Effective Writers. Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Booth Olson, C., D'Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D., & Olinghouse, N.; Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse (NCEE 2012-4058; first published 2012, revised October 2018). 2018.A U.S. government practice guide in which an expert panel made four recommendations for teaching writing in elementary school and rated the evidence behind each.ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/17

How we write these pages

  1. We read the source itself, not a news story about it.
  2. Every finding on a page names its source and where in the source it is found, so you can check it.
  3. We say how strong the evidence is, in the words of the people who reviewed it.
  4. We say what the research does not tell us. Most studies are done in schools, and no study can say what one child needs.
  5. If we get something wrong, tell us at hello@sounditoutreading.com and we will correct the page.

More from The Reading Lab

See all the research pages

Free · 2 minutes

Is reading hard for your child, and you are not sure why?

“Behind in reading” can mean ten different things, and each one needs different help. Check off what is true for your child. You will see the one thing to work on first, and what can wait.

Find where to start